Others like thinking, fast and slow Features >>
Feel The Fear And Do It Anyway
Thinking For A Change
Think And Make Impact
The Principles And Power Of Vision
The Principles And Power Of Vision (Keys To Achieving Personal And Corporate Destiny)
50 Mindful Steps To Self Esteem
Approval Addiction
How To Stop Worrying And Start Living
Sign Posts On The Road Of Success
Futureboards
About the Book
"Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman explores the two systems that drive the way we think: the fast, intuitive System 1 and the slow, deliberate System 2. Kahneman examines how these systems shape our judgments, decisions, and biases, shedding light on the inherent flaws in human cognition and offering insights on how to make better choices. The book explores various psychological phenomena and provides practical strategies for improving decision-making skills.
Billy Graham
Billy Graham (born November 7, 1918, Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.âdied February 21, 2018, Montreat, North Carolina), American evangelist whose large-scale preaching missions, known as crusades, and friendship with numerous U.S. presidents brought him to international prominence.
Conversion and early career
The son of a prosperous dairy farmer, Billy Graham grew up in rural North Carolina. In 1934, while attending a revival meeting led by the evangelist Mordecai Ham, he underwent a religious experience and professed his âdecision for Christ.â In 1936 he left his fatherâs dairy farm to attend Bob Jones College (now Bob Jones University), then located in Cleveland, Tennessee, but stayed for only a semester because of the extreme fundamentalism of the institution. He transferred to Florida Bible Institute (now Trinity College), near Tampa, graduated in 1940, and was ordained a minister by the Southern Baptist Convention. Convinced that his education was deficient, however, Graham enrolled at Wheaton College in Illinois. While at Wheaton, he met and married (1943) Ruth Bell, daughter of L. Nelson Bell, a missionary to China.
By the time Graham graduated from Wheaton in 1943, he had developed the preaching style for which he would become famousâa simple, direct message of sin and salvation that he delivered energetically and without condescension. âSincerity,â he observed many years later, âis the biggest part of selling anything, including the Christian plan of salvation.â After a brief and undistinguished stint as pastor of Western Springs Baptist Church in the western suburbs of Chicago, Graham decided to become an itinerant evangelist. He joined the staff of a new organization called Youth for Christ in 1945 and in 1947 served as president of Northwestern Bible College in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Evangelism
Grahamâs emergence as an evangelist came at a propitious moment for 20th-century Protestants. Protestantism in the United States was deeply divided as a result of controversies in the 1920s between fundamentalism and modernism (a movement that applied scholarly methods of textual and historical criticism to the study of the Bible). The public image of fundamentalists was damaged by the Scopes Trial of 1925, which concerned the teaching of Charles Darwinâs theory of evolution in public schools in Tennessee; in his writings about the trial, the journalist and social critic H.L. Mencken successfully portrayed all fundamentalists as uneducated country bumpkins. In response to these controversies, most fundamentalists withdrew from the established Protestant denominations, which they regarded as hopelessly liberal, and retreated from the larger society, which they viewed as both corrupt and corrupting. Although Graham remained theologically conservative, he refused to be sectarian like other fundamentalists. Seeking to dissociate himself from the image of the stodgy fundamentalist preacher, he seized on the opportunity presented by new media technologies, especially radio and television, to spread the message of the gospel.
In the late 1940s Grahamâs fellow evangelist in Youth for Christ, Charles Templeton, challenged Graham to attend seminary with him so that both preachers could shore up their theological knowledge. Graham considered the possibility at length, but in 1949, while on a spiritual retreat in the San Bernardino Mountains of southern California, he decided to set aside his intellectual doubts about Christianity and simply âpreach the gospel.â After his retreat, Graham began preaching in Los Angeles, where his crusade brought him national attention. He acquired this new fame in no small measure because newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, impressed with the young evangelistâs preaching and anticommunist rhetoric, instructed his papers to âpuff Graham.â The huge circus tent in which Graham preached, as well as his own self-promotion, lured thousands of curious visitorsâincluding Hollywood movie stars and gangstersâto what the press dubbed the âcanvas cathedralâ at the corner of Washington and Hill streets. From Los Angeles, Graham undertook evangelistic crusades around the country and the world, eventually earning international renown.
Despite his successes, Graham faced criticism from both liberals and conservatives. In New York City in 1954 he was received warmly by students at Union Theological Seminary, a bastion of liberal Protestantism; nevertheless, the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, a professor at Union and one of the leading Protestant thinkers of the 20th century, had little patience for Grahamâs simplistic preaching. On the other end of the theological spectrum, fundamentalists such as Bob Jones, Jr., Carl McIntire, and Jack Wyrtzen never forgave Graham for cooperating with the Ministerial Alliance, which included mainline Protestant clergy, in the planning and execution of Grahamâs storied 16-week crusade at Madison Square Garden in New York in 1957. Such cooperation, however, was part of Grahamâs deliberate strategy to distance himself from the starchy conservatism and separatism of American fundamentalists. His entire career, in fact, was marked by an irenic spirit.
Graham, by his own account, enjoyed close relationships with several American presidents, from Dwight Eisenhower to George W. Bush. (Although Graham met with Harry Truman in the Oval Office, the president was not impressed with him.) Despite claiming to be apolitical, Graham became politically close to Richard Nixon, whom he had befriended when Nixon was Eisenhowerâs vice president. During the 1960 presidential campaign, in which Nixon was the Republican nominee, Graham met in Montreaux, Switzerland, with Norman Vincent Peale and other Protestant leaders to devise a strategy to derail the campaign of John F. Kennedy, the Democratic nominee, in order to secure Nixonâs election and prevent a Roman Catholic from becoming president. Although Graham later mended relations with Kennedy, Nixon remained his favourite politician; indeed, Graham all but endorsed Nixonâs reelection effort in 1972 against George McGovern. As Nixonâs presidency unraveled amid charges of criminal misconduct in the Watergate scandal, Graham reviewed transcripts of Oval Office tape recordings subpoenaed by Watergate investigators and professed to be physically sickened by his friendâs use of foul language.
Legacy of Billy Graham
Grahamâs popular appeal was the result of his extraordinary charisma, his forceful preaching, and his simple, homespun message: anyone who repents of sins and accepts Jesus Christ will be saved. Behind that message, however, stood a sophisticated organization, the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, incorporated in 1950, which performed extensive advance work in the form of favourable media coverage, cooperation with political leaders, and coordination with local churches and provided a follow-up program for new converts. The organization also distributed a radio program, Hour of Decision, a syndicated newspaper column, âMy Answer,â and a magazine, Decision. Although Graham pioneered the use of television for religious purposes, he always shied away from the label âtelevangelist.â During the 1980s, when other television preachers were embroiled in sensational scandals, Graham remained above the fray, and throughout a career that spanned more than half a century few people questioned his integrity. In 1996 Graham and his wife received the Congressional Gold Medal of Honor, the highest civilian award bestowed by the United States, and in 2001 he was made an Honorary Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire (KBE). Graham concluded his public career with a crusade in Queens, New York, in June 2005.
Graham claimed to have preached in person to more people than anyone else in history, an assertion that few would challenge. His evangelical crusades around the world, his television appearances and radio broadcasts, his friendships with presidents, and his unofficial role as spokesman for Americaâs evangelicals made him one of the most recognized religious figures of the 20th century.
martyr or madman: the unnerving faith of ignatius
âI am afraid of your love,â Bishop Ignatius wrote to the early church in Rome, âlest it should do me an injuryâ ( Epistle to the Romans  1.2). It is hard to imagine more ironic words. Ignatius, a disciple of the apostle John, was nearing seventy years of age when he sent the letter ahead of him on August 24 (somewhere between AD 107 and 110). He told them he remained âafraidâ of the believersâ love â meaning he was afraid that they would keep him from martyrdom, that they would âdo him an injuryâ by keeping him from being torn apart by lions. Ignatius sent a total of seven letters to seven churches en route to the Colosseum. This letter to the church in Rome gave his thoughts on martyrdom and extended a special plea for their non-interference in his. Instead of asking for whatever influence the Roman believers may have had to release him, he bids them stand down. In his own words, For neither shall I ever hereafter have such an opportunity of attaining to God; nor will ye, if ye shall now be silent, ever be entitled to the honor of a better work. For if ye are silent concerning me, I shall become Godâs; but if ye show your love to my flesh, I shall again have to run my race. Pray, then, do not seek to confer any greater favor upon me than that I be sacrificed to God. (2.2) And again, I write to all the Churches, and impress on them all, that I shall willingly die for God, unless ye hinder me. I beseech of you not to show an unseasonable good-will towards me. Suffer me to become food for the wild beasts, through whose instrumentality it will be granted me to attain to God. (4.1) Martyr or Madman? Michael Haykinâs assessment seems conclusive: âIn the seven letters of Ignatius of Antioch we possess one of the richest resources for understanding Christianity in the era immediately following that of the apostlesâ (31). Surveying Ignatiusâs letters to the seven churches on the road to Rome, Haykin summarizes three concerns weighing heavily upon the bishopâs mind: (1) the unity of the local church, (2) her standing firm against heresy, and (3) non-interference in his calling to martyrdom (32). The first and second are unsurprising, but what are we to make of the third? What do you think of a man saying, âMay I enjoy the wild beasts that are prepared for me; and I pray that they may be found eager to rush upon me, which also I will entice to devour me speedily. . . . But if they be unwilling to assail me, I will compel them to do soâ (5.2)? Who is this Daniel praying not for rescue but looking forward to the lionâs den? âChristians had been killed in the past, but few with as much enthusiasm.â Some scholars, Haykin notes, have called him mentally imbalanced, pathologically bent on death (32). Christians had been killed in the past, but few, if any, with such enthusiasm. What right-thinking Christian would write, âIf I shall suffer, ye have loved me; but if I am rejected, ye have hated meâ (8.3)? Was he a madman? âSanityâ to Ignatius Did he have an irrational proclivity for martyrdom? Can his death wish  fit within the bounds of mature Christian life and experience? If you were his fellow bishop and friend â say, Polycarp (later a martyr himself) â what might you say if you desired to dissuade him? You might call his mind to the holy Scripture â for example, Jesusâs prophecy of Peterâs own martyrdom (which happened years earlier in Rome). Jesus foretold, âTruly, truly, I say to you, when you were young, you used to dress yourself and walk wherever you wanted, but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will dress you and carry you where you do not want to go â (John 21:18). The apostle Peter did not want to go  and stretch out his hands in his own crucifixion. He did not want to be dressed by another and âcarriedâ to his death. Granted, he wanted that end more than denying his Master again, but it stands to reason that if he could have ended differently, he would have chosen otherwise. Or you might consider the apostle Paul and his second-to-last letter before he too was likely beheaded in Rome. âFirst of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every wayâ (1 Timothy 2:1â2). He exhorts that prayers be made for rulers that Christians might lead quiet and peaceful  lives. Pray for your leaders, in part, that they might be saved â and thus not given to killing you âall the day longâ for public entertainment (Romans 8:36). Ignatius to âSanityâ âBut,â the well-taught bishop might have responded, âdid not Peter write much of suffering and necessary trials as tests to our faith? Does not God place our faith in the fire (or the Colosseum) that it might be found to result in praise and glory and honor at Christâs revelation (1 Peter 1:7; 4:12)? Or did Peter not put forward the suffering servant, Jesus Christ, as our example to follow? Or is it not a âgracious thing in the sight of Godâ to endure suffering for righteousnessâ sake â something we are âcalled toâ and blessed in (1 Peter 2:20; 3:14)? And further, did Peter not tell the church to âarmâ themselves with this thinking (1 Peter 4:1), and to rejoice insofar as they share in Christâs sufferings, evidence that the Spirit of glory rests upon them (1 Peter 4:13â14)? âAnd what to say of our beloved Paul? Was it not he who was hard pressed to stay, even when fruitful labor awaited him? Did he not inscribe my heart on paper when he said, âTo live is Christ, and to die is gain,â and that to be with Christ is âfar betterâ (Philippians 1:21, 23)? And was it not also the case that, knowing he was walking from one affliction to the next, he walked the martyrâs path â against the behest and weeping of fellow Christians who threatened to break the apostleâs heart (Acts 21:12â13)? ââConstrained by the Spirit,â did he not go forward (Acts 20:22)? He testified that he did not count his life of any value nor as precious to himself, if only he could finish his race and ministry to testify to Godâs grace (Acts 20:24). He assured crying saints along the violent road that he was ready not only to be imprisoned but to die for the name of Jesus (Acts 21:13). They eventually submitted and said, âLet the will of the Lord be doneâ (Acts 21:14). Will you not imitate them, beloved Polycarp?â This imagining is to help us get into the mind of the âmadman,â as well as to warn us from drawing hasty applications. Though most will not consent so insistently and passionately to a martyrâs death, some will pass by other exits on the way to testifying to the ultimate worth of Christ. Messiahâs Madmen What might we, far from the lions of Ignatiusâs day, learn from the martyred bishop of Antioch? I am challenged by his all-consuming love for Jesus, a love that the world â and some in the church â considers crazy. Let fire and the cross; let the crowds of wild beasts; let breakings, tearings, and separations of bones; let cutting off of members; let bruising to pieces of the whole body; and let the very torment of the devil come upon me: only let me attain to Jesus Christ. (5.3) âIf we are madmen, let it be for Christ.â If we are madmen, let it be for Christ. Should not Paulâs words be stated over our entire lives? âIf we are beside ourselves, it is for God; if we are in our right mind, it is for youâ (2 Corinthians 5:13). If we are crazy, it is because of Christ. If we are in our right minds, it is for others to be won to the same madness we have. The love of Christ âcontrols usâ (2 Corinthians 5:14). Oh what a beautiful strangeness, what a provocative otherness, what an unidentifiable oddity is a Christian who loves Christ with his all and considers death to be truly gain. Such a one can see, even behind the teeth of lions, an endless life with him .