Others like the pursuit of titus Features >>
The Cost Of Discipleship
The Sons Of God, The Flood, The Tower Of Babel
The Gospel Of The Kingdom: Scriptural Studies In The Kingdom Of God
The Authority Of The Bible And The Rise Of The Modern World
Apologetics (A Justification Of Christian Belief)
The Ministers' Handbook Of Ceremonies
Revelation
The Seven Feasts Of Israel
Foundations For Discipleship
Aspersions
About the Book
"The Pursuit of Titus" is a spiritual guide that focuses on the biblical character of Titus and offers practical advice on how to live a godly life. The book emphasizes the importance of faith, perseverance, and obedience in achieving success and fulfillment in both personal and spiritual growth. Prophet Shepherd Bushiri provides insights and wisdom on how to pursue a life that honors God and fulfills one's purpose.
John Welsh
John Welsh [or Welch], minister of the gospel at Ayr, and grandfather of John Welsh of Irongray, the Covenanter, was born of an ancient and well-to-do family in Dumfriesshire about the year 1568. His early life gave to his family little prospect of his future greatness as a minister of Christ and son-in-law to Knox himself.
He was a riotous youth who frequently played truant at school and, when a young man, he joined himself to a gang of border thieves who lived by robbing the people of both nations. These unhappy escapades brought him to extreme poverty and, in the overruling providence of God, had the effect of humbling him to true repentance.
After obtaining his fatherâs pardon Welsh entered the newly-formed University of Edinburgh to prepare for the ministry of the Scottish Church. The University was still in its infancy, having been opened in 1583 by its distinguished Principal, Robert Rollock. Scotland was enjoying a revival of letters at this time and the study of theology was being earnestly pursued by persons of all ranks.
Welsh abounded in industry and ability, and was not slow to gain a mastery of Latin [the language of theology in that age] and a competent knowledge of Greek. But it was Divinity, rather than the Humanities, which must have made the deepest impression on the young mind of Welsh. In these halcyon days of the Scottish Reformed Church, the âCollege of Edinburghâ was not the secularised institution it has since become, but rather a model Reformed Theological Seminary, as good perhaps as any in Europe.
The supreme aim and end in view of the University curriculum was for students to be grounded in the glorious truths of the Word of God. Edinburgh University was a well of pure Calvinism, the streams of which were to inundate the entire nation and beyond.
Welsh had the noteworthy distinction of being the very first Edinburgh graduate to be ordained to the ministry. He completed the M.A. degree in August 1588, and proceeded to the charge of Selkirk, a town some thirty-eight miles south of Edinburgh. Selkirk was hard ground in which to sow the gospel seed. The inhabitants were ignorant and uncouth. The only spiritual teaching to reach them before Welsh had come through the labours of a few pious men whose office it had been to read there the Scriptures and Knoxâs Liturgy.
Welsh was here for about six years, living in lodgings because there was no manse. His whole time was taken up in spiritual exercises, preaching daily and praying without ceasing. Indeed, his prayerfulness was from the very start remarkable. When he went to bed at night he laid a Scotch plaid over the bed-clothes. During the night he would cover himself with this from the cold as he agonised with God in prayer. From the beginning to the end of his ministry he is reported to have spent seven or eight hours in prayer each day! (2)
However the gospel light brought by Welsh was far from welcomed by the people of Selkirk. It appears that they preferred their former darkness to Christâs gospel. No very considerable fruits were evident, and the hostility there was such that one of the local gentlemen, Scot of Headschaw, even cut off the rumps of the two horses which Welsh used for his preaching excursions into the surrounding countryside.
Hence, when a call was addressed to him by the people of Kirkcudbright [in the South-West of Scotland] he acquiesced and took up his post there in 1595.
Before he left Selkirk, however, Welsh had married the third and youngest daughter of John Knox by his second wife, Margaret Stewart, daughter of the second Lord Ochiltree [in Ayrshire]. The date of the marriage is uncertain, but it must have been at some time prior to 1596.
Elizabeth Knox and her two elder sisters had been brought up near Abbotsford in that part of the Borders now associated with Sir Walter Scott. For when Knox lay dying he had urged his wife to attend carefully to the education of the girls. Hence when Mrs Knox remarried, two years after the Reformerâs death, to Ker of Faldonsyde, she had taken pains to bring up the girls in the principles of the Christian religion.
Welshâs first charge at Selkirk was not far from Faldonsyde and it is not difficult to understand how he met his future bride. As King James VI would have it in a conversation much later, âKnox and Welsh â the devil never made such a match!â But we have every reason to see the hand of a gracious and wise God in this union. Elizabeth Knox was to prove a worthy helpmeet for her husband in all his sufferings for the gospelâs sake.
Welshâs removal to Kirkcudbright was not motived by thoughts of comfort. Kirkcudbright in those days was a hot bed of Catholicism. As such it might prove convenient at any time as a harbour for Spanish warships sent to crush the Reformed faith out of existence. David Blyth, the previous minister of the place had in fact been murdered. Blythâs name first appears in the townâs records in the year of the Spanish Armada.
He was an able and energetic man who had studied at Glasgow University under the Presidency of the renowned Andrew Melville. Melville had selected him as one of his coadjutors when he himself had transferred to the University of St Andrews. Blythâs assassination was unquestionably owing to his loyal struggle against the Popish faction at Kirkcudbright. It was to his pulpit that the young John Welsh now went, wearing gospel armour and wielding the sword of the Spirit.
He remained at Kirkcudbright about four years and was gladdened by a small harvest of converts through his ministry. Later on these spiritual children of Welsh frequented the preaching of Samuel Rutherford at Anwoth â truly an apostolic succession! (3) An anecdote relating to the removal of Welsh from Kirkcudbright to Ayr in 1600 is remarkable. It seems that he met at Kirkcudbright a gaily dressed young man called Robert Glendinning, who had recently returned home from his travels.
To this unlikely youth the prophetic Welsh addressed the counsel that he should change his dress and turn from his frivolities to study the Word of God, because he would be the next Reformed preacher at Kirkcudbright! The prediction was fulfilled. Glendinningâs name comes up for honourable mention in the correspondence of Rutherford.
This was a time of renewed blessing and outpouring of the Spirit in Southern Scotland. Welsh must have retained vivid impressions of the spiritual power evident at the 1596 General Assembly at which he sat in Edinburgh as commissioner with over four hundred men. As at the Disruption period much later, so in 1596 the great business of the Assembly was prayer and the confession of ministerial sin. It was John Davidson of Prestonpans who was given the task of opening the Tuesday meeting.
This he did so suitably that the assembled commissioners, filled with a profound sense of their shortcomings in Godâs service, were humbled to tears of conviction and repentance for the sins of their office.
The scene is best described in the words of David Calderwood: âWhile they were humbling themselves, for the space of quarter of an hour, there were such sighs and sobs, with shedding of tears, among the most part of all estates that were present, everyone provoking another by his example, and the teacher himself by his example, that the kirk resounded, so that the place might worthily have been called Bochim; for the like of that day was never seen in Scotland since the Reformation, as every man confessed.â
It was a Divine preparation for the evils to come. That 1596 Assembly was, as Calderwood observed, the last free Assembly of the Church of Scotland for many years to come. Not until the Covenant in Greyfriars Churchyard in 1638 did the General Assembly again meet freely. During the forty or so intervening years the life of Scots Presbytery was encumbered with Episcopalianism and her purity tainted with the leaven of Herod.
The statecraft of James VI is even now worth being called to memory. His Majesty had at first expressed his fondness for Presbyterianism and had cheered Welsh and his brethren by stating his royal wish to see an increase in the number of Reformed clergy in his realm. However after the death of Chancellor Maitland, James began to execute his long premeditated scheme to put down the Presbyterian Church and to replace it with an Episcopal Church of the English type.
He had more than one reason for seeking to subvert Presbytery. The Presbyterian ministers were apt to be rather too zealous in exalting the Headship of Christ to please a Stuart monarchâs ambitions. Furthermore, by assimilating the Scots to the English Church he hoped to smooth the way more easily to the throne of both Kingdoms. The details of this notorious conflict do not concern us here. But it is sufficient to say that a man of John Welshâs character and principles could not fail to fall foul of the Kingâs policy.
Outspoken in defence of the Churchâs true liberties, Welsh preached a notable sermon in St Giles, Edinburgh, in December of that same year, 1596. It was admirable theology; but, under the existing political circumstances, it was deemed to be a virtual act of treason. King James would soon have his revenge on Welsh in ample measure.
Welshâs sermons are of that âtorrentialâ kind that sweep all before them. The following specimen drawn from the pages of James Youngâs biography (4) may serve to illustrate the sort of denunciation of royal encroachment with which the walls of St Giles must have rung in that December sermon.
The passage is taken from a condemnation of selfishness in those landowners who preferred to pocket funds intended to support the gospel ministry: âA great many of you . . . are the cause of the everlasting damnation of a great part of the people, for want of the preaching of the Word of Salvation unto them . . .
Vouchsafe so much upon every kirk as may sustain a pastor to break the bread of life unto them, and think of the damnation of so many millions of souls of your poor brethren who might have been saved, for ought that ye know, if they had had the gospel preached unto them . . .â No hyper-Calvinism this!
From Kirkcudbright, John Welsh travelled northward to his third and last Scottish charge in the county-town of Ayr, with which town his name has ever after been associated. For it was here that his preaching was most remarkably owned of God to the pulling down of strongholds and the establishing of the Reformation. This association of Welsh with Ayr will be regarded as all the more remarkable when it is remembered that he spent slightly less than five years in the town â from August 1600 to July 1605.
Ayrshire, situated a little to the south of the Clyde, had become more favourably disposed in Welshâs time to evangelical doctrine then almost any part of Scotland. To Ayrshire had come, long before, the itinerant preachers sent out from Oxford by John Wycliffe. Here Wycliffite theology had found a home.
The âLollards of Kyleâ [âKyleâ being the old district around Ayr in the middle of the shire] had actively promoted evangelical beliefs long before the voices of Luther and Calvin had shattered the darkness of Romish superstition on the Continent. It was in the little Ayrshire villages Mauchline and Galston, as well as at Ayr itself, that George Wishart had preached in the west.
To Ayrshire Knox himself had come frequently. Here too a Bond had been publicly signed by many noblemen for the defence and proclamation of the true religion of Christ taught in the Scriptures.
John Welsh was not the first but the fourth Reformed preacher to come to Ayr. An Englishman, Christopher Goodman, had been the first labourer about the years 1559-1560. But he had quickly transferred to St Andrews, probably to be nearer the centre of affairs. He was succeeded by James Dalrymple who continued at Ayr to the year 1580. Following Dalrymple came John Porterfield, a man respected but not conspicuous for ability or exertion.
It was indeed as assistant to Porterfield that Welsh now came to Ayr in August 1600. On his arrival, he found at Ayr a small band of exemplary Christians, especially among the wealthier inhabitants of the town. Happily, the monuments of popery had been swept away and the Reformed Faith was preached in the ancient parish Church of St John the Baptist [one part of which has been restored and still stands to this day as the âFortâ, so named as the old Church had been put to secular use by Cromwell at the time of the Civil War].
But the bulk of the people at Ayr were still crude and barbaric, immoral and ignorant. Duelling in the streets was common. The private feuds of competing noblemen frequently led to the loss of many lives. A man could hardly pass through the streets in safety when Welsh first came to the town, so common were the fights and quarrels.
Welsh saw it all and his soul was stirred within him: âWhat nation [he expostulated] so polluted with all abominations and murders as thou art? Thy iniquities are more than the sand of the sea, the cry of them is beyond the cry of Sodom.â
Welsh addressed himself to the problem of the street fighting with all the energy of his holy soul. When he heard of such a brawl he would rush into the thick of the fight, clad often in a helmet, and would urge the combatants to sit down to a meal at a table placed in the street! After reconciling the parties he would conclude with prayer and the singing of a Psalm. Gradually this procedure used by Welsh proved successful. Little by little Ayr grew more peaceful.
Every aspect of Welshâs ministerial effort at Ayr was marked by extraordinary zeal for the glory of God, and by careful circumspection. He laboured to suppress Sabbath games, promoted decent sociality, disciplined and warned the unruly, studied intensely, prayed fervently and preached frequently. In addition to the two Sabbath Services he appears to have preached twice each day, from nine to ten in the morning, and from four to five each afternoon- all that as well as catechising and visiting the people!
Welshâs preaching was so moving that reports tell us his hearers could not restrain themselves from weeping under the intense sense of the presence of God in the services. Occasionally he shrank from entering the pulpit and intensified his prayer for Divine assistance. At such times the elders, who were intimate with their minister and his spiritual exercise, would notice that he enjoyed an unusual degree of liberty in the pulpit.
He became more sought after than any preacher in Scotland except Robert Bruce of St Giles, Edinburgh. Only Bruce excelled him in the pulpit. More than twenty years later when men spoke of the remarkable revival under David Dicksonâs preaching at Irvine, Dickson was to comment that âthe grape gleanings of Ayr in Mr Welshâs time were far above the vintage of Irvine in his own.â
In 1604 two events took place which enhanced Welshâs usefulness in Ayr. On the death of John Porterfield, Welsh became sole minister of the town in that year. But of far greater consequence than that was the outbreak of the plague in the east of Scotland. There had been frequent occurrences of the plague in Europe in the later Middle Ages.
Perhaps the last such outbreak in Britain was the Great Plague of London [though not confined to London] in 1665. No one who knows anything of the insanitary conditions which prevailed in those times can be in the least surprised that these fearful scourges swept periodically from one end of the land â indeed, at times, from one end of the continent â to another.
The sanitation at Ayr was quite as primitive as in most other parts of the land. Offal and filth accumulated on either side of the High Street which being the Kingâs highway, was not the responsibility of the town council. A more perfect environment for the breeding of the plague can scarcely be imagined. When once the epidemic broke out in one part of the land certain procedures were compulsorily introduced in the other towns to try to curtail the spread of the disease. But these measures were seldom adequate.
As the âpestâ travelled steadily westwards in 1604 the 3,000 inhabitants of Ayr grew more alarmed at the prospect of death. Welsh, as it might be expected, took full advantage of the opportunity providentially afforded for calling the people of Ayr to repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
It was at this time that an event occurred which brought lasting esteem to Welsh. Two pedlars arrived at the north side of the river seeking admittance by the Auld Brig [still in use]. Although they were able to show a clean bill of health from the place last visited, the magistrates [called âbailliesâ] would not admit them without first seeking the advice of the minister. Welsh came and on hearing the problem silently sought Godâs guidance in prayer.
He then declared âBaillie, cause these men to put on their packs again and be gone; for if God be in heaven, the plague is in these sacks.â The peddlers moved on and travelled to Cumnock, a few miles to the east, where the plague unhappily broke out, with fearful loss of life.
These short years, 1604-1605, were the most comfortable of Welshâs whole life. His popularity was very high with his own people. There were many hundreds of godly people in the town with whom he could share the burdens of his heart. Visitors to Ayr used to be able to see the manse gardens [a little off the High Street, where the rear of the Littlewoods premises now stands] renowned for the prolonged seasons of prayer, where the Ayr preacher used to hold sweet intercourse with Heaven.
It was even said that a light could sometimes be seen around the eminent saint as he knelt in intercession. But whether that be truth or legend it is certain that his prayer was very extraordinary. âO God, wilt thou not give me Scotland! O God, wilt thou not give me Scotland!â was one of the expressions he was heard to utter as he pleaded for the progress of the gospel throughout the whole land. It might be asked how many of us stir ourselves up to similar pinnacles of agonising intercession in our own generation.
But Welsh was not to enjoy this comfort for long. He was shortly to be taken from his little town of affectionate parishioners. The hour of King James VIâs vengeance had nearly come. James was now firmly seated on the throne of both Kingdoms.
His maxim of âNo Bishop, no Kingâ was beginning to find practical expression not only in the suppression of free Assemblies but now also in the imprisonment of faithful and able preachers. Matters came to a head for Welsh after the Aberdeen Assembly of 1605, to which he came late and after it had dissolved itself.
The King had forbidden the Assembly to convene at all â expecting that the commissioners would be too intimidated to meet. But a number of men did convene in Aberdeen despite the royal prohibition. They did no more than constitute themselves and then disperse. So that when Welsh arrived the men had departed. But this circumstance was not permitted to save him from the wrath of the King.
The printed volume of Welshâs sermons published in 1744 consists of sermons he delivered in Ayr at this period of his life, when the wrath of King James was gathering against him. Sensing no doubt that his days in Ayr were numbered he laboured to rivet the doctrines of the Word on the heart of his flock. The volume is scarce nowadays but is a feast of good things for those who can procure a copy. Two sermons on the âgreat white throneâ are followed by eight on the need of repentance and nine on the Christian warfare, etc.
The short selection shows that Welsh was a scholarly, balanced preacher â no ranter, no fanatic, but a careful student of Scripture and also a man fully acquainted with the hearts of men, both saved and unregenerate. His final sermon at Ayr was delivered in the morning of 23rd July, 1605. It was a discourse on the theme âNo Condemnation to Godâs Electâ. In the printed copy which has come down to us there appears the following valedictory prayer, evidently from the hand of Welsh himself:
âNow let the Lord give his blessing to his word, and let the Spirit of Jesus, who is the author of this verity, come in and seal up the truth of it in your hearts and souls, for Christâs sake.â
The Kingâs men summoned him after the sermon to appear before the Privy Council in Edinburgh. Taking leave of his sorrowing family and bidding farewell to his devoted flock, he prepared for the journey to the capital. The people longed and prayed for his speedy return. The Kirk Session ordained âto proclaim out of the pulpit that every man continue paying the contributions to the poor until the ministerâs homecomingâ. But that was not to be. Welsh was to see his beloved little walled town of Ayr no more.
After a sham trial he was committed to the Tolbooth prison in Edinburgh, from where he was shortly transferred to Blackness Castle in West Lothian. Blackness still stands to this day in pretty much the same condition, one can imagine, as it was in Welshâs time. It was a brutal place of confinement. Strangely, none appears to know who built it or why. Certainly its curious architecture dates from the age of bows and arrows.
Tradition has it that Welsh was put into the dungeon which can only be entered through a hole in the floor. If this is correct then the confinement of the preacher in such a foul hole can only be termed barbaric. The floor is of uneven, shelving rock, sharp and pointed underfoot so that the prisoner can neither sit, walk nor stand without pain.
There is no fire-place and scarcely enough light to read by. By comparison with it the Mamertine prison at Rome has been described as comfortable. It was here, off and on, in this grotesque architectural monstrosity that Welsh was confined till 6th November, 1606. No doubt the angel of the Lord stood beside him to strengthen his heart in those harsh and dreary months of solitude. It is no tribute to James VI that he made Blackness the principal state prison of his reign.
After the lapse of eight months or so King James disclosed in a letter to the Privy Council from Hampton Court [26th September, 1606] that Welsh and similar offending ministers were to be banished. Accordingly, several of the able Reformed preachers were condemned to the most remote parts of the Kingdom â Bute, Kintyre, Arran, Orkney, Caithness, Sutherland and Lewis.
Robert Bruce was sent to Inverness, where he speedily learnt Gaelic that he might spread the gospel among the ignorant Highland population. John Welsh was banished from the realm altogether and sent to France.
At 2 a.m. on the morning of November 7th, 1606, a boat lay off the Leith pier, in the Firth of Forth, ready to carry Welsh to the Continent. The November air must have been chill indeed for the preacher and his family who were shortly to part one from the other.
Welsh offered up the farewell devotions amid a large concourse of sympathisers and the boat sailed into the gloom of that winterâs morning to the strains of the 23rd Psalm, leaving behind many a heavy heart and tear-stained cheek. So touched was James Melville who was present on the occasion, that he wrote of the event, âGod grant me grace for my part never to forget it!â
More than six months were to pass before Welsh saw his wife and family again â at Bordeaux, the same port into which he himself now sailed in December, 1606. If the true character of a man is revealed in his conduct while suffering, Welsh must emerge from the test as one of the mighty men of faith.
Oblivious of the cramp and agues he had to live with after the sufferings of his confinement, he writes to his friend Robert Boyd of Trochrig, âDesiring and thirsting for no other thing under heaven but that I may be fruitfully, with comfort, employed in His work, after the manner, and in the place and part where the only wise God has appointed and decreed . . .â And again: âThe fulfilment of my ministry is certainly dearer to me than my life itselfâ . . . [Preaching] is my principal desire, and I could be content with mean things . . .â
Preaching was so much his âprincipal desireâ that he at once set about to acquire the language of his place of exile. He progressed so rapidly that he was able to address a French congregation in the space of fourteen weeks! These early attempts in French were in very many ways remarkable.
It appears that the doctrinal parts of his sermons were delivered with a good degree of grammatical correctness, but that when the preacher warmed to his theme and began to make his application, he became more and more vehement- and less and less grammatical! Any speaker who has at all felt the limitations of his grasp of an acquired language will sympathise with Welsh!
But, characteristically enough, he resorted to the following expedient to correct this fault. He arranged for one or other of his hearers to stand up whenever his grammar began to deteriorate. This was the signal to Welsh to pay extra attention to the technicalities of language! Within three years he brought out a book in French, âLâArmageddonâ in which he exposes the evils of the âRoman Babylonâ.
France! the land of Calvin and of the Huguenots! It was into this cockpit of conflicting theologies that the pastor from Ayr now came. Here he met numbers of his expatriated fellow-countrymen, notably Robert Boyd of Trochrig, with whom he kept up a correspondence. Boyd, son of the Archbishop of Glasgow and proprietor of lands in Ayrshire, was Professor of Theology at the University of Saumur. Later, Andrew Melville was to be at Sedan, near the Belgian border.
By the year Welsh came to France, the Reformed Church there had already reached its zenith and fallen to a mere third of its strength. Perhaps no Church has passed through the fires of affliction more courageously than the Protestant Church in France in the years before the arrival of John Welsh. In 1571 the first Synod met at Rochelle under the moderatorship of Theodore Beza, Calvinâs colleague. It was a magnificent occasion.
The noble Queen of Navarre and her Son â afterwards King of France the Prince of Conde and the Count de Coligny, Admiral of France, were all present. No fewer than 2,150 churches were represented at the Synod. Many of the Reformed congregations were astonishingly large. That at Orleans numbered seven thousand communicants and was served by five pastors. âPerhaps in 1571, the Huguenots comprised one fourth of the whole population of Franceâ, is the conjecture of one church historian.(6)
But the French Church had reached its climax. So brutal was the persecution, particularly that of 1572, [the âSt Bartholomew Massacreâ] that by 1598 the number of congregations represented at the Synod of Rochelle had fallen to 760. The Church schools were broken up; her ministers poorly paid; her tone of piety lowered.
But the Edict of Nantes, which had received the royal seal in 1598, was now affording a respite to the Huguenot Churches. Welsh was himself present at the meeting of the Rochelle Synod of 1607. While he was there he was deeply touched by a visit from thirty of his old parishioners from Ayr, bearing letters from home and telling of the progress of the Kingâs Episcopal policy.
Welshâs indignation was white hot, but his confidence in the sovereignty of God enabled him to predict future good for the Scots Church: âYet that stock and trunk of Jesse shall flourish, and the Lord shall reign in the midst of his enemiesâ. He never lived to witness the âSecond Reformationâ of 1638 in Scotland nor the Long Parliament of 1641 in England, but the eye of faith pierced the mists of time and saw Christ overturning His enemies with the iron rod of his strength.
It would be fascinating to follow Welshâs steps in the subsequent years of his exile. But the details cannot be given here. In all he served in three French congregations â at Jonsac, where he was pastor, by an interim arrangement of the Provincial Synod, from 1608 to 1614; at Nerac, where he was minister of one of the four congregations of the town â finally at St Jean dâAngely, from about 1617 to the end of his public life in 1622.
His health was poor much of the time. If the sufferings of his beloved Church of Scotland were not enough to weigh him down, the distracting scenes before his very eyes in France must have contributed to his early death. Two forces were at work, towards the end of his life, which threatened the spiritual life of the Huguenot Churches. One was the rise and growth of Arminianism. In the second place the government still continued to bear down heavily upon Protestants. Louis XIII was now seated on the throne.
Bent on irritating and provoking the Protestants he raised an army in 1621 and resolved to crush Rochelle, the âGeneva of Franceâ, by force of arms. In the course of his march he laid siege to St Jean dâAngely, where Welsh preached. Here during the siege the intrepid pastor showed true heroism, venturing through the streets amid a hail of bullets and carrying gunpowder in his own hat to a Burgundian gunner on the city wall!
When the town capitulated, Welsh, disregarding all entreaties not to preach in public while the King was so close at hand, expounded the Word of God to a vast concourse of people, saying later to the enraged King: âSir, if you did right, you yourself would come and hear me preach, and you would make all France hear me likewiseâ. Of such stuff are Godâs true prophets made!
Distressed by this siege and by the disturbance it brought to the work of the gospel, Welsh at this time contemplated going to Nova Scotia to preach in the new Colony recently planted by James VI. But God was preparing to bring him shortly to a far better land. His physician advised him for reasons of health to return to Scotland to take his native air. But King James would allow him no more than to come to London.
It was in the English capital that Mrs Welsh obtained her famous interview with the King:
King James: âWho is your father?â Mrs Welsh: âJohn Knoxâ.
King James: âKnox and Welsh! the Devil never made such a match as that.â
Mrs Welsh: âItâs right-like, Sir, for we never asked his advice.â
King James: âHow many children did your father leave, and were they lads or lasses?â
Mrs Welsh: âThree, and they were all lassesâ.
King James: âGod be thanked, for if they had been three lads I had never enjoyed my three Kingdoms in peaceâ.
Mrs Welsh then asked permission for her husband to take his native air in Scotland.
King James: âGive him his native air! Give him the devil!â Mrs Welsh: âGive that to your hungry courtiersâ.
The King then agreed to allow Welsh to return to Scotland on condition he would submit to the bishops. Mrs Welsh held out her apron towards the King and said heroically: âPlease your Majesty, Iâd rather kep [receive] his head thereâ.
Welsh was able to preach once while in London, presumably in the pulpit of one of the Puritan âlecturersâ. This was his last appearance in public and he was âlong and ferventâ. He came down exhausted from the strain of speaking and returned to his London lodgings a dying man. As he lay dying he was occasionally overheard to say in prayer, âLord, hold thy hand, it is enough â thy servant is a clay vessel, and can hold no moreâ.
Within two hours of leaving the pulpit he resigned his spirit quietly and without pain into the hands of his Maker. So died one of those mighty spiritual giants whom it has pleased God to give to his Church from time to time. May it please him to raise up many another to the confounding of his enemies and the glory of his Name!
âI Worked Harderâ
ABSTRACT: âI worked harder than any of them.â Few figures in Scripture labor with the manifest industry of the apostle Paul. Where did such a prodigious work ethic come from? As one steeped in the Old Testament, Paul would have known and loved the many passages in Proverbs commending diligent, skillful labor and warning of idleness. The teaching of Proverbs, together with the mighty working of Godâs grace, produced an energy and effort that challenges the trend toward leisure in society today. For our ongoing series of feature articles for pastors, leaders, and teachers, we asked Robert Yarbrough, professor of New Testament at Covenant Theological Seminary, to profile the work ethic of the apostle Paul. We all know about COVID and its worldwide spread. Much attention focuses on the number of deaths, and not without justification. But the numbers do grow wearisome â numbers deceased, numbers testing positive, numbers in ICUs, numbers on ventilators, and now numbers vaccinated (or not). Such numbers are a sign of fundamental matters (like human health) amiss. There is, though, another set of numbers that had become commonplace long before COVID in most locations in the United States, and to an extent worldwide. They too point to something amiss. Iâm talking about lottery numbers, featured on various media outlets in most locales. The money squandered on these games of chance is staggering. While this is not the place to debate the wisdom, morality, or possible pros and cons of this form of gambling, I do believe that the popularity of lotteries alerts us to an emerging idol that Christians need to nip in the bud, if they have not already fallen to its worship. That idol is the love of being idle when it comes to gainful employment, like a job. (You play the lottery so youâll never have to work again, right?) Or when it comes to labor for the good of others, like being a parent who tends a household and rears children. Or like pastoral ministry, which is typically heavy on self-sacrificial labor for the sake of others. The idol I am envisioning is the love of leisure when the kingdom of God calls for engaged subjects: douloi (servants, slaves) joyfully (at least much of the time) doing the Kingâs bidding. It is the love of money for the sake of making habitual downtime and idle enjoyment possible. It is the love of self-indulgence and the exploitation of creationâs goods for personal pleasure rather than for the fulfillment of Godâs creation mandate and Christâs call to discipleship. It is the love of being served rather than of serving. Think cruise-ship getaway. In remarks below, I want to remind us of key insights from contemporary discussion, from Scripture, and especially from the apostle Paul that will help us maintain a healthy relationship to our work in life rather than skepticism or antagonism toward that work that leads to a harmful gravitation toward idle pursuits that God is unlikely to deem productive or redemptive. The Worth of Work, with a Warning Work in the sense of human toil to earn a living has received abundant attention from Christian writers in recent years. A book by my colleague Daniel M. Doriani serves as an example: Work: Its Purpose, Dignity, and Transformation.1 On the back cover, D.A. Carson comments, âThe last few years have witnessed a flurry of books that treat a Christian view of work. This is the best of them.â A few years back, Christianity Today carried a story on âreclaiming the honor of manual labor.â2 The article argued for the virtue and indeed necessity of more people learning trades rather than eschewing manual labor and avoiding jobs that demand arduous physical exertion. Of course, there is barren overwork, a bane to be avoided. Kevin DeYoung has written about it in Crazy Busy: A (Mercifully) Short Book about a (Really) Big Problem.3 If youâre too busy to get hold of the book(!), some main points were recently summarized online.4 DeYoung notes that busyness can empty life of joy, impoverish our hearts, and conceal and contribute to a bankrupt soul. When hard work (along with all of lifeâs other demands) shades over into obsessive hyperactivity, when we pour all our energy and devotion into gainful labor with no time or energy for anything else, we have idolized work, the benefits we plan to receive from it, or both. We need the psalmistâs reminder: It is in vain that you rise up early and go late to rest, eating the bread of anxious toil; for he gives to his beloved sleep. (Psalm 127:2)5 Yet while Scripture warns against work overload, it also models an appeal for God to bless our daily labors, not to rescue us from the need to perform them. The wonderful conclusion to Mosesâs sole contribution to the Psalter runs, Let the favor of the Lord our God be upon us, and establish the work of our hands upon us; yes, establish the work of our hands! (Psalm 90:17) Duly warned of vesting work with devotion that belongs to God alone, we can still call on him to bless our licit labors. And we are wise to ask, What is workâs value, in Godâs eyes? âWarned of vesting work with devotion that belongs to God alone, we can still call on him to bless our licit labors.â A considerable literature addresses this from various points of the world-Christian perspective. Esther O. Ayandokun draws on the Bible (along with other resources, both academic and religious) to argue for a work ethic without which the acute problem of poverty will only worsen in her location (Nigeria), where it is already severe.6 She argues that âwhen working hard is embraced by members of the society, the society will be free of corruption, thuggery, armed robbery, cultism, and other social vices.â7 More broadly, she concludes her survey of what Scripture says on the subject with this observation: [The] human race can fight poverty as they engage meaningfully in one job, or the other, depending on age, gender, skills, knowledge, and exposure. What is important is that no one should be idle, to the extent that such will only depend on the sweat of others perpetually. Everyone, who is old enough to work, must be employed gainfully. Efficient labour as established in the Scriptures, is a panacea for poverty alleviation; where each person (at work) does his/her best, to enhance production of quality goods, and services rendered.8 While panacea might not be quite the right word, that quotation lines up well with the wisdom on work that Proverbs offers, a wisdom that echoes in Paulâs life and letters. Work in Paul from Proverbsâ Perspective The apostle Paul, like other New Testament authors and Jesus himself, affirmed what we call the Old Testament as inspired by God and authoritative. While it is worthwhile to keep in mind views of work prevalent in Greco-Roman spheres or Judaism in the New Testament era,9 the New Testament often draws on the Old Testament to lay a foundation and to push back against the deficient understandings and practices of its day. The grass and flowers of the times wither and fade away, but Godâs word endures (1 Peter 1:24â25; Isaiah 40:6, 8). A survey of references to work or labor in Proverbs (using the ESV) reveals principles that play out in Paulâs view of his own apostolic, missionary, and pastoral activities. They are surely worth pondering for our own outlook and practice. 1. God is a worker, and his people labor with and for him. The Lord possessed me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old. (Proverbs 8:22) Here divine wisdom is personified, depicting the Lord as the Creator who works. That God is a worker, and that people made in his image are designed to work too, is widely accepted in the literature. This statement is typical: âPaul would have had a full understanding of God as worker, humankind as created for work, work properly done as glorifying God, but work also corruptible by the fall.â10 Accordingly, Paul viewed himself and others as coworkers (ESV âfellow workers,â synergos) with God (1 Corinthians 3:9). Nearly a dozen times, Paul mentions fellow workers; he views this fraternity of work as not merely human-with-human but also people laboring with God alongside, as when he calls Timothy âour brother and Godâs coworker in the gospel of Christâ (1 Thessalonians 3:2). Paul viewed himself and his wide circle of accomplices as âfellow workers for the kingdom of Godâ (Colossians 4:11). 2. Hard work is virtuous, and slothfulness is a vice. From the fruit of his mouth a man is satisfied with good, and the work of a manâs hand comes back to him. (Proverbs 12:14) The hand of the diligent will rule, while the slothful will be put to forced labor. (Proverbs 12:24) Both of the passages above commend work by using hand to signify hard, competent, and gainful effort. âThe work of a manâs handâ is how Paul described his ministry: âWe labor, working with our own handsâ (1 Corinthians 4:12). He counseled new converts at Thessalonica âto aspire to live quietly, and to mind your own affairs, and to work with your hands, as we instructed youâ (1 Thessalonians 4:11). For someone in the church wrestling with the temptation to steal, Paul commanded, âLet the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in needâ (Ephesians 4:28). âThe epitaph of many a failed ministry and minister could be summed up with Proverbsâ words: âHis hands refused to labor.ââ The point is not that only manual or trade work is of value. It is rather that every believerâs life should be centered on Godâs service for the promotion of Godâs glory. Since in Paulâs day (as when Proverbs was written centuries earlier) most livelihoods required what we would consider hard physical work, Paulâs word to all believers in all situations was, âWhatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for menâ (Colossians 3:23; see also 3:17; 1 Corinthians 10:31). Even allowing for changes over the ages, that is still perfectly understandable and highly applicable whatever our station in life today. âThe slothful will be put to forced laborâ expresses the conviction that the lazy run the risk of being commandeered by forces they could have escaped if they had gone to work for God and the good on their own. In Pauline terms, one thinks of his warning that we become slaves to sin if we reject faith in and service for Christ (Romans 6:16). 3. God guides the life direction and outcome of the person who works to honor God. Commit your work to the Lord, and your plans will be established. (Proverbs 16:3) This statement taps into the common canonical conviction of Godâs benevolent and personally attuned sovereignty. Those who trust in him will find that he has gone before them; their efforts and labors will prove to have purpose, meaning, and value, because God has overseen and directed their way. A related conviction is stated a few verses later: âThe heart of man plans his way, but the Lord establishes his stepsâ (Proverbs 16:9). Those who labor in fellowship with the Lord and in accordance with his purposes can be assured of Godâs support, assistance, and ultimate vindication, even if oneâs assignment ends in seeming disaster (like John the Baptistâs beheading, or Christâs cross). Paulâs work was certainly committed âto the Lord.â This is epitomized in the statement âI have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in meâ (Galatians 2:20). Paul can exhort the Philippians to practice what Paul taught and modeled, assuring them that âthe God of peace will be with youâ (Philippians 4:9).11 Their lives, the plans by which they live them, and the ends to which they strive âwill be established,â as Proverbs 16:3 puts it. When Paul labored in Ephesus, he frankly acknowledged, âThere are many adversariesâ (1 Corinthians 16:9). But he purposes in the very same verse not to flee but to exploit âa wide door for effective work,â as âthe Lord permitsâ (1 Corinthians 16:7). Ministry often proceeds under ominous auspices. But that may be precisely when Godâs upholding hand is most vigorously at work. Sometimes fears are realized and calamity occurs â as Paul and Silas experienced in founding the Philippian congregation: âThe crowd joined in attacking them, and the magistrates tore the garments off them and gave orders to beat them with rods. And when they had inflicted many blows upon them, they threw them into prisonâ (Acts 16:22â23). This doesnât sound like a successful church-planting event. But Paul and Silas stood firm in trusting the God they served in Christâs name. God used their poise and praise (Acts 16:25) to convert the jailer and his household and to establish a congregation. Paulâs unswerving resolve illustrates what it means to minister under the conviction that âyour plans will be established.â 4. Idleness is destructive of those who languish in it. Whoever is slack in his work is a brother to him who destroys. (Proverbs 18:9) The desire of the sluggard kills him, for his hands refuse to labor. (Proverbs 21:25) From different angles, both of these verses warn of the destructive effect of idleness. The person âslack in his workâ can probably rationalize it a dozen ways: âItâs Monday; Iâm worn out from the weekendâ (often a true statement for pastors!). âItâs Friday; Iâm gearing up for the weekendâ (maybe a prelude to skipping out of work for the golf course, or laying weekend plans to skip church . . . again). âHalf-hearted effort, or doing much less than is possible, is the norm for many, whatever their occupation.â Half-hearted effort, or doing much less than is possible, is the norm for many, whatever their occupation. I think I see this attitude often in big-box home improvement stores when I need help in hardware or plumbing. It can be impossible to catch the eye of the attendant who is paid to help you. You might have to sprint to catch those who sense you want their help, as they suddenly feel the urge to flee to a distant aisle. Paul urged churches to âadmonish the idle, encourage the fainthearted, help the weak, be patient with them allâ (1 Thessalonians 5:14). The examples of Paul, Silvanus, and Timothy served as a public demonstration of how Christians should comport themselves: âYou yourselves know how you ought to imitate us, because we were not idle when we were with youâ (2 Thessalonians 3:7). âSlack in his workâ and âthe sluggardâ describe an âidlenessâ Paul decried: Now we command you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is walking in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us. (2 Thessalonians 3:6) For we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work, but busybodies. (2 Thessalonians 3:11) The epitaph of many a failed ministry and minister could be summed up with Proverbsâ words above: âHis hands refused to labor.â Failure to expend full effort can be justified in all kinds of ways, from self-care to self-love to a demonstration of the conviction that weâre not saved by works â so weâll perform works sparingly and sporadically, since they arenât really required for salvation. Paulâs example runs the opposite direction. Comparing himself with the other apostles, he speaks of Godâs grace toward him, the former persecutor, and avers that this grace âwas not in vainâ (1 Corinthians 15:10). What proof does he point to? âI worked harder than any ofâ the other apostles, though Paul knows âit was not I, but the grace of God that is with me.â Because of that very grace, Paul toiled prodigiously, and not for a season or a year but over decades. 5. God is pleased by those who develop and apply the ability to work hard and skillfully. Do you see a man skillful in his work? He will stand before kings; he will not stand before obscure men. (Proverbs 22:29) This is one of my favorite verses in Proverbs. I grew up under a grandfather and father who did tree work â for Davey Tree Expert Company â and as a young man I devoted over six years to full-time tree climbing and timber felling, first for Davey, and then for lumber mills in western Montana and Idaho. For the first quarter-century of my life, I watched workmen come and go â attrition in this trade is high for understandable reasons. Men (at that time I knew of no women who climbed trees or felled timber) who had high standards for their work were rare. Theft of company equipment was common. Avoiding the hard or dangerous roles was the norm. Bosses knew they had to keep a sharp eye out for workers cutting corners or turning in work they did not perform. In those same years, I observed certain older men who stood out. They were kept on the payroll when others were laid off. The quality of their work set them apart. They were âskillfulâ (see the Proverbs verse above) in their attitude and execution. Years later, some owned their own companies or had moved to positions of oversight. Jesus taught, âOne who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in muchâ (Luke 16:10). In line with this, Paul taught Timothy and Titus to pay close attention to those whom their social settings regarded as less important people, like women and children and slaves. Paul spends more verses instructing Timothy on widows (1 Timothy 5:3â16) than on any other people group â including overseers! It was vital that Timothyâs care for the flock extend to what Jesus called âthe least of these,â rather than majoring on the mighty and the wealthy, who easily attract church leadersâ fullest attention. Paul knew that church leaders who failed in the pastoral care of the seemingly less significant were unlikely to withstand the pressures and blandishments that come with duties that attract higher public visibility. In college, a young man training for the ministry was the envy of his classmates. He seemed to have a photographic memory. While others were beating Greek into their heads, not always with success, he would glance at the textbook right before quizzes and ace them all. But after graduation, despite his ability and intelligence, his level of ministry effectiveness fell below potential. Did this go back to being clever and gifted but not âskillful in his workâ? Had he perhaps not really learned to work? In contrast, in that same college there was a fellow student who proved âskillful in his work.â He applied himself with the humor and energetic daily output that he had brought with him from his rural upbringing. He went on to be a highly published Old Testament scholar, professor, and speaker who has built up thousands of students, readers, and pastors in the faith over many decades. âHe will stand before kings; he will not stand before obscure menâ was actually fulfilled in the apostle Paulâs life, as God transformed a man zealous to oppress into a man eager âto carry [Christâs] name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israelâ (Acts 9:15). Paulâs consistent, all-out attention to more modest tasks the Lord set before him from the start â like in Damascus immediately proclaiming âJesus in the synagogues, saying, âHe is the Son of Godââ (Acts 9:20) at great peril to himself â led to a witness that spoke all the way up to kings (Acts 26:2â29). Paulâs message has continued to challenge people and peoples everywhere, from common folk to global elites, down to this hour. But what about his ethos of unstinting hard work to get that message out?12 Recovering the Pauline Work Ethic An old saying from previous generations was âAn idle mind is the devilâs workshop.â Today there are desires for leisure like never before and often the technological means to indulge those desires. COVID lockdowns and confinements have likely exacerbated temptations to idleness. It is not easy to find either the will or the means to busy ourselves in ways that sanctify and harness our inner restiveness so that the main thrust of our lives furthers divine ends rather than worldly trivialities. How many hours weekly do many in the church, including ministers, squander in online activities that are excessive or even illicit? Then there are, for some, still more hours of TV or movies or sports â all justifiable in theory, but in many lives amounting to a replacement of what should consume us: God, the furtherance of his kingdom, and labors that promote his holy and redemptive aims for us. Yes, God grants rest and leisure and recreation in their appropriate place. But many believers at some point wake up to how worthy Christ is of their devotion, not merely sentimentally or âspirituallyâ but in the expenditure of time and physical energy in ways that social media, ESPN, CNN, FOX, Internet browsing, and other black holes for time wastage cannot monetize. In many cases, we are not only idolizing indolence but paying for the privilege. âIn many cases, we are not only idolizing indolence but paying for the privilege.â And the higher household income becomes, the more temptation there is for extravagant pursuits to dominate our horizon and make us forget that we are supposed to be âmaking the best use of the time, because the days are evilâ (Ephesians 5:16). As church members, we are under the oversight of those charged with equipping us âfor the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christâ (Ephesians 4:12). The percentage of church members, in most cases, whose notion of equipping goes beyond reasonably regular church attendance is probably impressive â mainly in the sense of appalling. So what are most Christians doing with most of their discretionary time? And what motivates them as they perform their daily labors? Are we mainly working for the weekend? Do we disappear for hours daily into cyberspace or other fantasy worlds in which we are serving, God knows, neither him nor people? To put it in a flurry of Pauline declarations and commendations that point to the all-out effort that the gospel spawned in the early church: Bear one anotherâs burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. (Galatians 6:2) Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor. Do not be slothful in zeal, be fervent in spirit, serve the Lord. (Romans 12:10â11) Contribute to the needs of the saints and seek to show hospitality. (Romans 12:13) Greet Mary, who has worked hard for you. (Romans 16:6) Greet those workers in the Lord, Tryphaena and Tryphosa. Greet the beloved Persis, who has worked hard in the Lord. (Romans 16:12) We labor, working with our own hands. (1 Corinthians 4:12) Always [abound] in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain. (1 Corinthians 15:58) Be subject to such as these, and to every fellow worker and laborer. (1 Corinthians 16:16) If I am to live in the flesh, that means fruitful labor for me. (Philippians 1:22) It is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure. (Philippians 2:13) For this I toil, struggling with all his energy that he powerfully works within me. (Colossians 1:29) Pray without ceasing. (1 Thessalonians 5:17)13 Let our people learn to devote themselves to good works, so as to help cases of urgent need, and not be unfruitful. (Titus 3:14) Such references are the tip of an iceberg of the industriousness that characterized those first mobilized by Christ and his gospel. Is this not a dynamic worth upholding now against all countervailing forces? Precisely in our time of unprecedented challenge and peril for Christians worldwide, there is need to reaffirm the conclusion reached in a recent study of Paulâs (high) regard for work: Failure to work â sloth â represents faithlessness toward God and our neighbor. There is no rank among Christians in the work place, as there is dignity and equality between all who labor and no task for the kingdom that is of lesser importance than any other. As Christians, our work is to sustain and support others and to relieve their burdens, as Paulâs work did, as we work for Christâs kingdom. Hard work is the norm for the Christian, as it was for Paul, whether manual labor or otherwise, as it is a witness to others of our faith. To be that witness our work should follow the self-giving example of Christ, focused on Him and on others and not ourselves, marked by agape love.14 May Godâs gospel grace move many more of us in this direction, smashing all idols of opposition to Godâs work through our hands. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2019. â© Jeff Haanen and Chris Horst, âThe Handcrafted Gospel,â Christianity Today, July/August 2014, 66â71. â© Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013. â© Kevin DeYoung, â3 Dangers of Busyness,â Crossway (blog), December 9, 2020, https://www.crossway.org/articles/3-dangers-of-busyness/. â© Unless otherwise noted, Scripture references are from the ESV. â© âThe imperative of dignity of labour as a panacea for poverty alleviation in Nigeria,â Practical Theology (Baptist College of Theology, Lagos) 7 (2014): 84â110. See also Jude Lulenga Chisanga, âChristian Spirituality of Work: A Survey of Workers in Ndola City, Zambia,â African Ecclesial Review 60, nos. 1/2 (2018): 10â24. â© Ayandokun, âThe imperative of dignity of labour,â 100. â© Ayandokun, âThe imperative of dignity of labour,â 88â89. â© For this background, see, e.g., Christoph vom Brocke, âWork in the New Testament and in Greco-Roman Antiquity,â in Dignity of Work â Theological and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Kenneth Mtata, Documentation 56 (Minneapolis, MN: Lutheran University Press, 2011), 25â28. Accessible at https://www.lutheranworld.org. Alexander Whitaker, âPaulâs Theology of Work,â Puritan Reformed Journal 12, no. 2 (July 2020): 32. â© Annang Asumang, âPerfection of Godâs Good Work: The Literary and Pastoral Function of the Theme of âWorkâ in Philippians,â Conspectus 23, no. 1 (January 2017): 1â55, helpfully unpacks the theme of Godâs work in that epistle, along with ânot just the inward spiritual transformation of the Philippians, but also its social consequence and the Philippiansâ synergistic active participation inâ Godâs work (42). But stress is laid on Godâs provision and enabling, not the work ethic from the human side needed to embody Godâs outpoured energies. â© See Akinyemi O. Alawode, âPaulâs biblical patterns of church planting: An effective method to achieve the Great Commission,â HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 76, no. 1 (2020): a5579, https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i1.5579. This study describes concepts, patterns, models, and strategies. But there is no direct mention of the hard effort required for any of this to have worked for Paul or to work today. â© Those who obey this command assiduously know that while it has its joyful aspects, it is nevertheless work. â© Whitaker, âPaulâs Theology of Work,â 41. â© Article by Robert Yarbrough